Hi Stan,
Excellent analysis !
Salute,
Stewart
stan_ccd wrote:
> --- "howsoft_paul" <howsoft@...
> > I wasn't interested in the pixel size so much as the
> > number of pixels so that was governing my choice.
> > I'm oversampled at my site ... but this is not
> > necessarily a bad thing from what I understand.
>
> I agree - oversampling is not a bad thing. If you are taking a sky-
> limited exp then there is no penalty for oversampling. And so-
> called "oversampling" is very useful for extracting the maximal
> resolution from the virtual image:
> http://www.stanmoor
> <http://www.stanmoor
>
> Stan
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar